Effective
Date: July 1, 1988
|
The
Office of the Vice President
and General Counsel
|
Updated/revised:
April 1, 1993
|
Statement on Freedom
of Speech and Artistic Expression:
The
Rights and Obligations of Speakers, Performers,
Audience Members,
and Protesters at
the University of Michigan
Civil Liberties
Board, July 1988
Preamble
Recent events at the
University of Michigan and elsewhere emphasize the pressing need
for members of the University community -- including administrators,
faculty, staff, and students -- to reaffirm formally their deep
commitment to freedom of speech and artistic expression and to clarify
the implications of that commitment. Freedom of speech in this context
will be taken to encompass all forms of communication and artistic
expression as well as the freedom to listen, watch, protest, or
otherwise participate in such communication. It is hoped that this
reaffirmation will win the support, in spirit and in letter, of
people representing the entire spectrum of opinion of the University
community in order to create a truly open forum, one in which diverse
opinions can be expressed and heard.
Expression of diverse
points of view is of the highest importance, not only for those
who espouse a cause or position and then defend it, but also for
those who hear and pass judgment on that defense. The belief that
an opinion is pernicious, false, or in any other way detestable
cannot be grounds for its suppression.
When a speech or some
form of artistic expression such as a play or a concert is prevented
by disruptive protest from taking place or concluding, the effect
is just as surely an attack on freedom of speech or artistic
expression
as the deliberate suppression or prohibition of a speaker or artist
by authorities. At the same time, however, the rights of freedom
of expression enjoyed by speakers or performers do not negate
the
rights of free expression of those who would protest the speech
or performance.
The guidelines that
follow concern how most fully to protect rights of free expression
for speakers, performers, and protesters alike. They apply to settings
in which an audience has been assembled for a talk or performance,
or in which a talk or performance takes place in a public setting
at the University, but do not apply to the classroom. They are not
general guidelines concerning freedom of expression among individuals
or in other University settings where protest might occur. Moreover,
they do not cover physical acts of violence, or verbal harassment
or threat directed at individuals in which there is no intent to
communicate publicly or with a wider audience. Nor do these guidelines
in any way restrict the application of civil or criminal law. Finally,
these are not guidelines concerning appropriate or civil conduct
at speeches or artistic performances. Rude or offensive behavior,
though inconsistent with the standards of civility that we hope
would prevail on a university campus, sometimes fall within the
legitimate exercise of freedom of speech and, when it does, may
not be suppressed.
These guidelines apply
to members of the University community (students, faculty, staff,
and administrators) and to their invited guests. By following these
guidelines we seek to maintain at the University an environment
in which the free exchange of opinions can flourish, where the learning
that such exchange makes possible can occur. We welcome members
of the broader public to participate in this free exchange, and
we expect those who do to observe the limits of mutual tolerance
embodied in these guidelines.
With these qualifications
in mind, the Civil Liberties Board of the Senate Assembly recommends
to the University community endorsement and adoption of the following
guidelines pertaining to freedom of speech and artistic expression.
Guidelines
1. It is the right of
members of the University community (including students, faculty,
staff, and administrators), speakers, artists, and others invited
by members of the University community to set forth their views
and opinions at the University.
2. Within its lawful
authority to do so, the University will protect the right of any
member of the University community, or any invited speaker or artist,
to speak or perform, and also will protect the rights of those members
of the University community who wish to hear and communicate with
an invited speaker or artist.
3. It is the responsibility
of University officials or the organizers of an event to make a
judgment when there is a clear and present danger that the rights
of freedom of expression and communication of a member of the University
community, invited speaker, or invited artist will be infringed
upon, and to take appropriate measures, consistent with these Guidelines,
to safeguard these rights.
4. It is inconsistent
with full respect for freedom of speech and expression-- though
itself a form of protected speech-- for members of the University
community to exert pressure to revoke an invitation for a speaker
to appear at the University because of the potential for a violent
reaction to the speech, or the threat of disruption of the speech,
and such pressure should be resisted. Likewise, refusal to invite
an individual to speak solely because his or her presence may invite
violence and disruption is contrary to the intellectual ideals of
the University.
5. Within the confines
of a hall or physical facility, or in the vicinity of the place
in which a member of the University community, invited speaker,
or invited artist is addressing an assembled audience, protesters
must not interfere unduly with communication between a speaker or
artist and members of the audience. This prohibition against undue
interference does not include suppression of the usual range of
human reactions commonly displayed by an audience during heated
discussions of controversial topics. Nor does this prohibition include
various expressions of protest, including heckling and the display
of signs (without sticks or poles), so long as such activities are
consistent with the continuation of a speech or performance and
the communication of its content to the audience.
6. Protesters have rights,
just as do speakers and artists. The standard of "undue interference"
must not be invoked lightly, merely to avoid brief interruptions,
or as to remove distractions or embarrassment. The University has
an obligation to provide members of the community, and invited speakers
and artists, with personal security and with reasonable platforms
for expression; moreover, it has an obligation to ensure audience
access to public events. The University does not, however, have
the obligation to insure audience passivity. The University cannot
accept stipulations by invited speakers or artists of terms of appearance
that are inconsistent with allowing full freedom of expression to
the University community. Protesters and other members of the University
community, for their part, have an obligation not to abuse their
rights of expression to harass or intimidate speakers in ways that
unduly interfere with the expression or communication (see Guideline
5). It is, of course, always within the rights of protesters to
express their opposition to a speaker in appropriate ways outside
of the hall or physical facility or area where a lecture, meeting,
or performance is being held, or to organize alternative forums.
7. Speakers are encouraged
to exchange ideas with members of the audience and to engage in
dialogue so that points of contention can be addressed directly.
It is the responsibility of all parties so that such dialogue not
become a means of interfering unduly with free expression and communication,
as understood in Guidelines 5 and 6.
8. If any of the parties
within the confines of the hall or physical facility interfere unduly
with freedom of expression or communication, the organizers or University
representative must, if possible, put such parties on notice that
they are interfering unduly with such rights. If the notified parties
do not stop their undue interference, the organizers or University
representative should proceed with those measures deemed necessary
to stop it, which may include the physical removal of individuals
from the area. Canceling, stopping an event, adjourning to another
time or place, or allowing protracted interruption of a speech,
meeting, or performance is inconsistent with full respect for the
rights of free expression and communication of those present. The
overriding goal of the organizers or University representative during
a disruption should be to reestablish with deliberate speed an atmosphere
conductive to communication between the speaker or artist and the
audience, and to full respect for the rights of all parties.
9. Because freedom
of speech and expression play such a critical role in the functioning
of a university, undue interference with the exercise of these
freedoms by members of the University community may constitute
grounds for
resort to law or other formal action. Any University procedures
for formal action must be
evenhanded in their
application to all parties-- whether organizer, protester, or
audience
member, or administrator, staff, faculty, or student-- and must
provide full due process and equal standing to bring a complaint.
10. It is the responsibility
of all members of the University community and their guests to observe
and facilitate these Guidelines. Any institutional procedures for
enforcement other than resort to law fall within the jurisdiction
of the Regents' Bylaws.
11. Officers of the
University's Department of Public Safety will act in accordance
with the procedures outlined in this document. When non-University
security forces are summoned, it is understood that they are not
under the direct control of the University, but they should be made
aware of University policies set forth in these Guidelines.
12. The University
should provide appropriate platforms for free speech and artistic
expression.
Whenever areas surrounding a public event are cordoned off for
security purposes, this must not be done in such a way as to
remove the possible location of any
protest so far from the center of action that the protest is
thereby rendered totally ineffectual.
Organizers of the event or University representatives should make
clear in advance which areas have been cordoned off, and for what
purpose.
13. Whenever possible,
lines of communication between those sponsoring or managing an event
and those considering protesting the event should be arranged and
maintained during the event.
For more information, contact:
The Office of the Vice President and General Counsel
(734) 764-0304
http://www.umich.edu/~vpgc/
|